Hundreds of Sittingbourne residents march in protest at prospect of additional housing
Home / Blog / Hundreds of Sittingbourne residents march in protest at prospect of additional housing
Momentum has been building since last May when Swale Borough Council announced which additional sites they had selected to add to the Local Plan to reach new targets set by Government Inspector Sue Turner a couple of months earlier.
It’s fair to say that Sittingbourne is paying a heavy price in order to protect a large area of the borough around Faversham.
One of those additional sites is a large area of land in the south of Sittingbourne between Borden Lane and the A249, known as the Wises Lane development. The development which consists of 675 new homes of which a maximum of 10% will be affordable, a new sports ground for the Sittingbourne Rugby Union Football Club, new primary school and promises of facilities such as a new GP Surgery has proven highly unpopular with the residents of Borden.
Today in a bid to speak out before the inquiry into the Local Plan reconvenes next week, members of Borden Residents Against Development (BRAD) organised a protest march from the Maypole Inn in Borden to the Swale House where they handed in a petition to council leader Andrew Bowles.
Cllr Roger Truelove, who is opposed to the development explained “This development is not necessary, it won’t actually meet local need. It is just going to attract high spending house owners from other parts of the South East. It’s not viable in terms of the traffic, transport, road system and it’s going to have a detrimental effect on the landscape.”
Residents claim “it will spoil the village, it won’t be a village anymore with all those houses and the roads are full now without an additional 1,000 cars on the road.”
Others were critical of the amount of affordable housing and ability of younger local residents to remain in the area due to high house prices.
Cllr Mike Baldock who also opposes development in this location told us “Transport is a big issue , but there is also the importance of establishing a gap our villages and Sittingbourne."
Talking about issues raised in a recent appeal Mike said “What was interesting during the Gladman appeal, was that Swale Borough Council claimed to be 900 houses over their target. If they were telling the truth, they don’t need to build this site.”
With cries of “hedgerows not houses “, “No more gridlock” and “Save our village” around 300 residents began to make their way along The Street and into Borden Lane on the long walk into Sittingbourne to be joined by even more protesters waiting outside Wilko before making the way along the High Street to Swale House.
On the steps of Swale House, as BRAD member Gaynor Aspin confronted Council Leader, Andrew Bowles he said “At the end of the day we are not promoting the site” a point which I put the opposition party Councillors.
Cllr Mike Baldock (UKIP) said “For Bowles to suggest the council are not promoting this site is not just a ridiculous statement, it is a wilful attempt to mislead local residents. Swale have gone out of their way to facilitate this development to meet their unbalanced Local Plan, and have promoted Quinn's preferred option of further development with a series of extra reports and consultations in an attempt to hide the fact that the allocation fails on so many levels to be sustainable.”
“It's time for the Tories to come clean, admit they were wrong to zone the borough and re-consult on the whole plan - and maybe actually listen to residents - just for once.”
Cllr Roger Truelove (Labour) told us “That is a little economical with le verite (the truth). The Council is required to find sites by the Government from those first omitted from the draft Local Plan. Because of the zoning policy adopted by the Council, they have a preference for a site in South Sittingbourne. The Cryalls Lane / Wises Lane area is their number 1 preferred site despite the fact that it will add to the A249 problems, that themselves will be exacerbated by the 1500 houses for NW Sittingbourne. So, it is Government first and Swale Borough Council second.”
Following the end of proceedings BRAD member Gaynor Aspin told us “I am so pleased with the turnout, it shows the strength of opposition to this ridiculous inclusion in the Local Plan of the development of Wises Lane.”
Showing comments 1 to 6 of 6
On the subject of whether Swale is "promoting" this site, it says on the Council's website pages about the Local Plan "this site was allocated by the Council in the context of the Inspector's interim findings" Semantically allocating in response may not be the same as promoting but it is a bit much to try to dissociate Swale from the process. This site is allocated as the number 1 option from amongst the original omission sites.
Comment by Roger Truelove on 30 Jan 2017
If you believe the developers that they will build a new sports field for the Rugby Club then you must be mad.......... Why waste month that's 10 more houses that they can sell and make even more money.
Comment by John on 28 Jan 2017
It's laughable that people think that these new homes will help the homeless, if they could afford them they would not be homeless in the first place. "Affordable" is a term not based in reality and like with the schools commitment can be changed when the "viability" argument gets pulled by the developers. If this was for 30 houses I don't think it would cause much argument but such large developments are not sustainable. If all the brown feild sites were used and each village took 20-30 houses that would help as would proper town planning.
Comment by Lee Burgess on 28 Jan 2017
Its not all about Houses!! To get a DR's appointment is a nightmare now, hospitals are at breaking point , traffic is a major problem! So when people comment , were there any homeless people on march , I don't know, but do you really believe building high end properties in Borden is going to help the homeless !!??
Comment by Christine on 28 Jan 2017
Seems like a case of I'm alright jack. I bet there weren't any homeless people on that demo. Move with the times, where would you suggest they build them, or don't you think they should be built at all.
Comment by Jim Carlow on 28 Jan 2017
Hi it was good day
Comment by Gerard on 28 Jan 2017